RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

2003-12-24 Thread Mike Kuentz (2)
> >No not entirely, apologies aren't necessary perhaps its me being thick >as a plank today me, too. >If mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can come from different mail servers >@sprint, then surely you would need: > >whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] which would cover the host name. > This wou

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

2003-12-24 Thread Terry Milnes
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: Terry Milnes wrote: I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same servers and owned by the same people. I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren't the same domai

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

2003-12-24 Thread Mike Kuentz (2)
> Terry Milnes wrote: > I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is > NOT the same > domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same > servers and owned by the same people. I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren't the same domain, th

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

2003-12-24 Thread Terry Milnes
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same servers and owned by the same people. whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprintspectrum.com Terry

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.

2003-08-28 Thread Cowles, Steve
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: > Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the > answer? Mike, I never did get a reply to my orignal post. But I did find a work around to the whitelist_rcvd_from not working with my implementation of postfix/SA. I ended up adding my own custom hea

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.

2003-08-28 Thread Mike Kuentz (2)
Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the answer? -Original Message- From: Cowles, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question. Mike Kuentz

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.

2003-08-10 Thread Cowles, Steve
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: > To properly add the sender into whitelist_from_rcvd should it be > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 63.83.98.169 > > since they don't have reverse DNS set up? If not what should it be? > unknown is right before the IP address in brackets, but it's not a > domain n

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question

2003-06-20 Thread Charles Mount
Try using whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] webmail2.usainteractive.com It seems that the second argument needs to be a FQDN server name not just the domain part.

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question

2003-06-18 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:59 PM 6/18/2003 -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote: Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com [209.11.17.108]) by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id h5IJZO0q028359 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed 18 Jun 2003 12:35:24 -0700 "unys-2.n