On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SA 2.60
> Postfix 2.0.16
[snip..]
> So, I added whitelist entries to /etc/spamassassin/local.cf for all
> the machines in my home lan, and restarted spamassassin.
> def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]haggis
> def_whitelist_from_rc
I have not been able to resolve this one. I am still getting these messages
identified as spam. spamc results in the same score from the logs and does
not show the whitelist effecting the score at all. spamassassin --lint does
not show any error messages and other wise SA is identifing tons of o
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Bonny wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> In my ./spamassassin/user_prefs I put:
>
> whitelist_from@tuttinudi.com
Try:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http:/
At 07:41 PM 7/29/2003 +0200, Bonny wrote:
Hello all!
In my ./spamassassin/user_prefs I put:
whitelist_from @tuttinudi.com
BUT e-mails coming in from that domain (I mainly get it from ONE
address, which is a mailing list) are still caught as SPAM!
What can I do?
I already did "sa-learn" on the
I'm going to repost a message from Gary Funck that solves this
nicely. I've been running it for awhile and it works like a charm.
--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 08:08:49 2003
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:56:10 -0700
From: Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SpamAssassin listserve <[E
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:34:53PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox,
> bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips with!)
If you're using procmail, yes. Basically you need to put the logic of
"do I want to filte
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> However, I still see SA checking info in the headers of the whitelisted mails.
> Is this normal, please?
Yes. A white/black-list does not stop SA from running over a message.
They simply add a certain value (positive or negative) to the
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:10:15AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> The only way to not have SA check a message is to not call SA under
> certain conditions.
What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox,
bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips w
