Scott Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:01:21AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
"Of course, you probably need to use a userprefs database in that case,
rather than the userprefs in each user's home directory."
Aside from moving the process to another system, Are you saying that seting
up t
>Scott Lambert wrote:
>Seperate the two functions. Run spamd on a dedicated box with lots
>of CPU and memory. Disk is not terribly important. Just add -d
>spamd.box.domain to you spamc invocation on the mail server.
im currently already running them as 2 separate functions but on the same mac
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:01:21AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> "Of course, you probably need to use a userprefs database in that case,
> rather than the userprefs in each user's home directory."
>
> Aside from moving the process to another system, Are you saying that seting
> up the users in a
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:39:58AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > hi list
> > >
> > > however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time,
> > > the CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this ha
Oh joy, this broken vacation rule even replies to the list sometimes!
wonderful! The only way it could be "better" is if the rule engaged in
conversations with itself posting to the list.
And people wonder why I feel that vacation rules should not be written by
anyone without a decent backgroun
this doesn't
even matter to me.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lambert [mailto:lambert@;lambertfam.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTE
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > hi list
> >
> > however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the
> > CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail
> > server becomes very slow and sometimes users complain that t
I am out of the office from Monday, Oct 21st until Thursday, October 24th.
Tom
---
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ads.sourcefo
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi list
>
> however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the
> CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail
> server becomes very slow and sometimes users complain that they are
> not abl