Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread Rick Beebe
Scott Lambert wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:01:21AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: "Of course, you probably need to use a userprefs database in that case, rather than the userprefs in each user's home directory." Aside from moving the process to another system, Are you saying that seting up t

re : Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread dmarie-spamassasin
>Scott Lambert wrote: >Seperate the two functions. Run spamd on a dedicated box with lots >of CPU and memory. Disk is not terribly important. Just add -d >spamd.box.domain to you spamc invocation on the mail server. im currently already running them as 2 separate functions but on the same mac

Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:01:21AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > "Of course, you probably need to use a userprefs database in that case, > rather than the userprefs in each user's home directory." > > Aside from moving the process to another system, Are you saying that seting > up the users in a

Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:39:58AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > hi list > > > > > > however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, > > > the CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this ha

OT: Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread Matt Kettler
Oh joy, this broken vacation rule even replies to the list sometimes! wonderful! The only way it could be "better" is if the rule engaged in conversations with itself posting to the list. And people wonder why I feel that vacation rules should not be written by anyone without a decent backgroun

RE: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread Chris Santerre
this doesn't even matter to me. -Original Message- From: Scott Lambert [mailto:lambert@;lambertfam.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-23 Thread Dallas Engelken
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > hi list > > > > however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the > > CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail > > server becomes very slow and sometimes users complain that t

Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-22 Thread tgwilt
I am out of the office from Monday, Oct 21st until Thursday, October 24th. Tom --- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourcefo

Re: [SAtalk] spamd uses a lot of CPU

2002-10-22 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi list > > however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the > CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail > server becomes very slow and sometimes users complain that they are > not abl