Quite frankly, I don't see any tangible benefit from implementing that
feature into SA. Not to be negative, but the proposed change has several
major flaws I can see:
1) custom-built-to-avoid-filters spam is not restricted to small emails,
you can make a large one that is also tailored to avoid
matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 17:06:00 -0400]:
> Really short spams are something SA alone isn't very good at. Fortunately
> systems like Razor are wonderful at them, and the DNS blacklists help too:
While Razor is great still someone must get the spam first. Which is
unfortunate. DNS bl
I've been seeing more of these in the past few weeks as well. If spammers
had brains, I'd say that they're realizing that the more text they put in
their messages, the more ammo they're giving us to shoot them with.
As this type of spam becomes more common, I think we're going to have to
rely more
Really short spams are something SA alone isn't very good at. Fortunately
systems like Razor are wonderful at them, and the DNS blacklists help too:
Using 2.42 I get:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.9
tests=CTYPE_JUST_HTML,MSGID_CHARS_SPAM,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_DSBL,
