nk of processing to those persistent
connections. (and I can always fill the 2nd cpu slot to be a total freak)
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Wilder
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAt
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:32:41AM -0500, Todd Schuldt wrote:
> SA is also file IO intensive. It depends on your hard drive system for the
> file IO as well - using IDE or SCSI or SAN? Hard or soft RAID? If hardware
> RAID what cache size and what mode 0, 1, 5, 10, 50? What drive speed? Also
>
Just to echo Todd's suggestions. Disk I/O is your primary issue. I
recommend using RAID mirroring instead of RAID 5 since RAID5 has such
crappy write performance. Physical memory is important if your box is
slow enough to queue up multiple spamd processes, but any modern machine
will clear t
I have SA running as
a Filter/Relay on a RH 7.3 box. It is a Celeron 1.4Ghz. It
processes mail for about 250 users. It has a single 7200RPM IDE
drive and 768MB of PC100 RAM. I process around 4000 messages a day (Most
of it spam)
- Original Message -
From:
Wiebren
Br
SA is also file IO intensive. It
depends on your hard drive system for the file IO as well – using IDE or
SCSI or SAN? Hard or soft RAID? If hardware RAID what cache size
and what mode 0, 1, 5, 10, 50? What drive speed? Also depends on OS
choice and MTA.
I use RH 7.3 with CommuniGa
