On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:05, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can I only filter selected domains even individual mailboxes ?
> Is this possible ? I was told that qmail was most likely not a good
> choice for this as the mail handler in qmail is not very
> customisable. Is this true ?
> If s
HOLY DISCLAIMER BATMAN!
We use postfix and love it. It is highly configurable and I know there is
much doc online re individual spam settings w/ Mysql.
Re qmail, I found this doc for configuring individual user settings
http://sylvestre.ledru.info/howto/howto_qmail_spamassassin_with_pref.php
Mi
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:16:00PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Given that it's RedHat, I bet it's 2.4x.
RH9 has 2.5x I believe. fyi.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"And now for another example that we're fond of going to ... from 1 or 2
charges ... to billions and billions." - Prof.
ee
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] general question
--On Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:13 AM -0500 Dan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hey, I'm new to this mailing list, and to spamassassin for that
matter.
> Couple quick questions.
> 1. How do I tell which v
--On Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:13 AM -0500 Dan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hey, I'm new to this mailing list, and to spamassassin for that matter.
> Couple quick questions.
> 1. How do I tell which version of spamassassin my isp is running?
> They're hosting us on a Redhat box.
You
1. Messages marked as SPAM will have the following header (or similar):
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
That should identify the version for you. Note only messages that score
will have this header.
2. By default spamassassin makes no changes to the subject
At 10:13 AM 8/5/2003 -0500, Dan Lee wrote:
Hey, I'm new to this mailing list, and to spamassassin for that
matter. Couple quick questions.
1. How do I tell which version of spamassassin my isp is
running? They're hosting us on a Redhat box.
Newer versions will put the version into the x-spam-
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:58:09PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter is rumored to have said:
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:16:00PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Given that it's RedHat, I bet it's 2.4x.
>
> RH9 has 2.5x I believe. fyi.
>
Linux puma 2.4.20-19.9smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 15 17:04:18 EDT 2003 i68
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:23:50AM -0700, Steve Thomas is rumored to have said:
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:58:09PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter is rumored to have said:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:16:00PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > > Given that it's RedHat, I bet it's 2.4x.
> >
> > RH9
