On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Scott Lambert wrote:
> We complained to them about spam to "@inch.com" this morning. They
> responded saying they were 100% opt-in. We went looking through the
> maillog.
>
> Dictionary spam. The nerve of some people.
Define several unused names. Send their mail to somepla
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Scott Lambert wrote:
> We complained to them about spam to "@inch.com" this morning. They
> responded saying they were 100% opt-in. We went looking through the
> maillog.
>
> Dictionary spam. The nerve of some people.
Looks like they were added to the Spamhaus SBL as of 14
Time to update your BigEvil.cf list:
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
Latest entry:
uri BigEvilList_191
/\b(?:starterz\.net|linksss\.com|53x\.net|savvypurchaser\.com|hurricane\
-map\.com|webcastingsales\.com|thisishow2market\.com|Opportunity\.com|66\.98
\.194\.243
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 08:41:28AM -0500, Rubin Bennett wrote:
> They're getting harder to catch: this one came in this morning and only
> scored 4.0 out of 5.0.
>
> The only identifying feature that I can come up with is that it was sent
> to an address that I no longer use. I'm going to write
That was the source.
Here's the email saved to mbox, just in case I missed something in my
cut n' paste.
Thanks!
Rubin
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 10:34, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I believe the source held much more info. I added this domain to bigevil
> this morning, but it was already tagged over 7.0!
I believe the source held much more info. I added this domain to bigevil
this morning, but it was already tagged over 7.0! I have deleted it from my
spambox. I could dig it up out of corpus. Can you post the source?
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
