Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Bugzilla #317 and #18 refer to this. #317 includes a patch which needs some
> work to integrate it into CVS. Matt, do you want to take this one?
I'll take it with the premise that we're weeks away from releasing our
new anti-spam solution (based on spamassassin of cours
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DQ>
DQ> > Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
DQ> > SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
DQ> > just a matter of setting the content-type to multipart/mixed, and set
D
Bugzilla #317 and #18 refer to this. #317 includes a patch which needs some
work to integrate it into CVS. Matt, do you want to take this one?
C
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> Ed Ames wrote:
MS> >Has any thought been given to formatting the SpamAssassin "grading
MS> > information" as a legit at
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
>
>
>>Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>
>
>>> The problem with that is, of course, that it messes up existing MIME...
>>>meaning that people will bitch about not having the cake and eating it at the
>>>same time, or s
On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
> Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > The problem with that is, of course, that it messes up existing MIME...
> > meaning that people will bitch about not having the cake and eating it at the
> > same time, or sumthin like that. :-)
>
> It doesn
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
>
>
>>Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>>
>>>Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integ
On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
> >>SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
> >>just a matter
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
>>SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
>>just a matter of setting the content-type to multipart/mixed, and set
>>the first
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
> SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
> just a matter of setting the content-type to multipart/mixed, and set
> the first part to text/plain, and the
Ed Ames wrote:
>Has any thought been given to formatting the SpamAssassin "grading
> information" as a legit attachment rather than simple adding it to the
> beginning of the message body as text. Unfortunately, the text added
> to the beginning of the message really messes up some of the HT
Message-
From: Olivier M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Ed Ames
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Grading Information as attachment
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 11:00:07AM -0500, Ed Ames wrote:
>Has any thought been given to formatting
11 matches
Mail list logo
