On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:44:13PM -0700, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
> What is recommended these days?
MIMEdefang is, IMHO beautiful. When used with mimedefang-multiplexor it can
handle lots of mail in a very efficient fashion.
And, as a bonus, you can virus scan through it.
Dan.
--
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:37:47AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> yep, spamass-milter seems to be a bit flaky, from reports.
> Not recommended anymore.
What is recommended these days?
When I originally installed SA, MimeDefang looked like it was
more than we wanted. There was another one I looked
>
> Bryant, Eric D. said the following on 19/10/02 21:01:
>
> > 4. How well does it perform at large sites? (We process around
> > 5-700,000 emails a day)
>
> We do about 10 million a day, but then we have over 400 mail servers.
> SpamAssassin can seriously overload a box, so be very careful.
Bryant, Eric D. said the following on 19/10/02 21:01:
4. How well does it perform at large sites? (We process around
5-700,000 emails a day)
We do about 10 million a day, but then we have over 400 mail servers.
SpamAssassin can seriously overload a box, so be very careful.
5. What MTA do y
Mike Van Pelt said:
> FedEx package tracing got tagged until we whitelisted FedEx.
Any chance you could forward a few of these to me? It'd be good to see if
we could come up with some kind of meta-rule exclusion for this, as
package tracking is a big deal.
Just obfuscate any ID strings to "zzz
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:01:39PM -0500, Bryant, Eric D. wrote:
> I am working on implementing a spam-filtering solution for Purdue
> University and SpamAssassin is one of the products at the top of my
> list. I'm wondering if you guys can give me some feedback as to what
> your experiences have
Bryant, Eric D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 5. What MTA do you recommend?
(I think the other questions have been addressed, so I'll just stick to
this one since you'll probably get a lot of "use the MTA that I use"
messages.)
I recommend one of sendmail, exim, or postfix.
qmail has a lot of
Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So at a default threshold of 5.0, you could expect an FP rate of
> 0.62%
I think the actual FP rate is much lower than that because we have a
very difficult GA corpus with lots of newsletters and other non-spam
that looks very similar to spam.
It's ve
Actually every user does have a Unix account, but it is separate from
the mail server. They are in the process of changing the whole email
architecture to be a 16-node Linux cluster right now. Should be
interesting to see how it all works out.
-Eric
--On Saturday, October 19, 2002 4:57 PM -04
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:01:39PM -0500, Bryant, Eric D. wrote:
> I am working on implementing a spam-filtering solution for Purdue
> University and SpamAssassin is one of the products at the top of my
> list. I'm wondering if you guys can give me some feedback as to what
> your experiences have
--On Saturday, October 19, 2002 4:57 PM -0400 Ross Vandegrift
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Watch it so you don't tread on clued users' procmailing. Maybe include
> a warning if the user's .procmailrc already exists, or spit the rules
> out to a different file...
Creative use of environment varia
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:01:39PM -0500, Bryant, Eric D. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on implementing a spam-filtering solution for Purdue
> University and SpamAssassin is one of the products at the top of my
> list. I'm wondering if you guys
--On Saturday, October 19, 2002 3:01 PM -0500 "Bryant, Eric D."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Can SA work well as an opt-in/opt-out solution?
I first encountered SA on The Well (http://www.well.com) and it was offered
as an opt-out service. A web page is provided to opt out and to fine-tune
se
13 matches
Mail list logo
