On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:37:47AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> yep, spamass-milter seems to be a bit flaky, from reports.
> Not recommended anymore.

What is recommended these days?

When I originally installed SA, MimeDefang looked like it was
more than we wanted.  There was another one I looked at briefly;
I don't recall what it was, but it was (1) advertised as Alpha
code, (2) didn't do body substitutions to put in the detailed
spam explanation, and (3) put its own "custom" header in 
for spam, not the ones SpamAssassin does that I like.

-- 
Mike Van Pelt      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to