On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:37:47AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > yep, spamass-milter seems to be a bit flaky, from reports. > Not recommended anymore.
What is recommended these days? When I originally installed SA, MimeDefang looked like it was more than we wanted. There was another one I looked at briefly; I don't recall what it was, but it was (1) advertised as Alpha code, (2) didn't do body substitutions to put in the detailed spam explanation, and (3) put its own "custom" header in for spam, not the ones SpamAssassin does that I like. -- Mike Van Pelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
