Robert Nicholson wrote:
>
> Is the mail or checksum sent to a DCC server?
Checksum.
> Could you try this one. It's also low scoring in 2.61
Here's the output I got:
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by coll.pair.com
with SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp);
Sat, 13 Dec
Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Just a bit of a "me too" post, I checked my last two days email including
> Ham and Spam and checked the hitrate of DCC and RAZOR2 and here were the
> results:
>
> Ham: 0 DCC hits, 1 RAZOR2 hit out of 203 Ham messages.
> Spam: 174 DCC hits, 57 RAZOR2 hits out of 242 Spam mes
> "Covington, Chris" wrote:
>>
>> On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is,
>> of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it
>> too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false
>> positives)... but I've weighted my scoring according
On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is,
of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it
too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false
positives)... but I've weighted my scoring accordingly.
Chris
-
