At 12:06 PM 1/17/2004, Scott Harris wrote:
After a lot of research and trial and error I believe I've found the
solution.
Mimedefang needed a lot of tuning on the per process multiplexor processes
as
well as the number of min and max slaves. It appears as though I needed to
increase
the memory fro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Harris
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Problems running begevil and tripwire together
>
> I think I've narrowed it down to this by try
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Harris
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 9:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Chris Santerre'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Problems running begevil and tripwire tog
massassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Problems running begevil and tripwire together
>
> Wow that is weird! I think I'm running Tripwire 1.13 because
> they came so fast and furious I didn't get a chance to
> upgrade my own server today. Is there some limit to
Wow that is weird! I think I'm running Tripwire 1.13 because they came so
fast and furious I didn't get a chance to upgrade my own server today. Is
there some limit to mimedefang? I haven't seen these errors but don't use
mimedefang. But I run more rules then almost anyone. I only have 64 megs! SA
