On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Barry Jaspan wrote:
> Everyone, please calm down!
>
> The amount of confusion on this list is staggering. One very important
> point that many people seem to be missing:
>
> Network Associates did *not* buy SpamAssassin!
>
> NAI bought Deersoft, Inc. Deersoft develops and
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 the voices made Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder write:
ADvB> They probably signed any number of NDAs during the negotiation, so
ADvB> warning the community before the deal was complete was obviously not
ADvB> possible. A short explanation to the list at the time when the de
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 23:56, Barry Jaspan wrote:
> Everyone, please calm down!
>
> The amount of confusion on this list is staggering. One very important
> point that many people seem to be missing:
>
> Network Associates did *not* buy SpamAssassin!
>
> NAI bought Deersoft, Inc. Deersoft deve
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 the voices made Copeland, Mary R write:
CMR> But I still have my question about how the addresses I've added to my
CMR> "blacklist" can contribute to updating the spam filters database.
They can't; SA doesn't focus on blacklisted addresses, instead it works by
looking at
Title: RE: [SAtalk] NAI did not buy SpamAssassin!
Good point!
But I still have my question about how the addresses I've added to my "blacklist" can contribute to updating the spam filters database. Is there a particular address to which I can send a copy? or does any
At Tue Jan 7 22:56:43 2003, Barry Jaspan wrote:
>
> Everyone, please calm down!
>
> The amount of confusion on this list is staggering. One very important
> point that many people seem to be missing:
>
> Network Associates did *not* buy SpamAssassin!
>
> NAI bought Deersoft, Inc. Deersoft d
Good points. The only thing lost is some developers. Though hopefully
the SA community will work to make up. I am currently learning Perl,
and have been observing the project for weeks. Hopefully soon I can
start kicking in some code.
That's the only loss.
A name is just a name. If th
