On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 the voices made Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder write:
ADvB> They probably signed any number of NDAs during the negotiation, so
ADvB> warning the community before the deal was complete was obviously not
ADvB> possible. A short explanation to the list at the time when the deal was
ADvB> published would probably have avoided most misunderstandings.
I don't think there's been any (major) misunderstandings, it's just that we
view the situation differently...
I think we all agree on NetAss not being able to kill the SA-code no matter
how hard they try, we also agree on people being able to fork into a new
project if something seems to go wrong with the SpamAssassin-project as it is
today.
The problem is what will happen _if_ something changes from the way it is
today, and what _might_ happen _if_ there is ever a problem for the leaders of
this project (now the employees of NetAss) where they might have to make a
smaller "where's my loyalty"-decision.
--
/\___/\ /\___/\
\_@ @_/ \_@ @_/
+--oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo--+
| Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
+---ôôô---ôôô--------------------------------------------ôôô---ôôô---+
\O/ \O/ (c)1998-2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \O/ \O/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
