Re: [SAtalk] Header problems

2003-12-09 Thread lpala
OK Guys, you are right, just a procmail configuration error... The message was read twice... and the most of the time SA didn't recognize it as SPAM (and it was right :) Tnx Luca Scrive Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 03:18 PM 12/9/03 +0100, Luca Palazzo wrote: > >i'm experiencing a strab

Re: [SAtalk] Header problems

2003-12-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:18 PM 12/9/03 +0100, Luca Palazzo wrote: i'm experiencing a strabge problem using Spamassassassin (2.60).. It recognizes a mail as spam, rewrite message (using the rule from safe_report 1) but adds its header with wrong X-Spam-Status.. This is typicaly what happens when you run mail through S

RE: [SAtalk] Header problems

2003-12-09 Thread Bill
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_50,BIZ_TLD,CASHCASHCASH, > DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONT_BIG, > HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 The message was not spammy enough to trigger SA. Your bayes gave it a neutral value