RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Ah, I see now. It's probably the link to exclaimer.co.uk which is a product that puts boilerplate disclaimers at the end of Exchange 200x emails. Lawyers love those things. Idunno why it's in there. -tom > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Chris Santerre
I'm sure this is an FP left over from my pull from initial scripts. I don't remember adding them by hand. They check out as legit. They will be removed from next update. (Which was meant for last Sat. but something came up. --Chris > -Original Message- > From: Paul Barbeau [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Kelson Vibber
At 05:02 AM 1/26/2004, Tom Meunier wrote: You're asking why would "exotic playthings" or "excellentoffers" be a spam indicator? No, he's asking why exclaimer.co.uk would be considered a spam sign: At 12:02 PM 1/23/2004, Paul Barbeau wrote: I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Tom Meunier
You're asking why would "exotic playthings" or "excellentoffers" be a spam indicator? If it gives you FPs, just lower the score in your local.cf. Or view the source of the email in question and look at what's tripping it. 3.0 isn't enough to FP all on its own, after all - there's some other spa