At 02:44 PM 1/5/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
Do you know where that is doc'd? I can remember a conversation a while ago
about that not being the case - that the rule was still executed, but
effectively disabled... but maybe I'm mixing things up - sorry.
it's in the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf manpage
ED] Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:36 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob); Upwood, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Auto disable rules...
At 01:52 PM 1/5/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
>Hmmm- unless I missed something (and I MAY have) setting a score of 0
>doesn't
At 01:52 PM 1/5/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
Hmmm- unless I missed something (and I MAY have) setting a score of 0
doesn't disable. The rule is still run - it just doesn't effect the score,
the only think that removes a rule is removing the rule -
Setting a score of 0 DOES disable the rule. It is
Hmmm- unless I missed something (and I MAY have) setting a score of 0
doesn't disable. The rule is still run - it just doesn't effect the score,
the only think that removes a rule is removing the rule - and then the code
is still compiled, it just isn't run - would be a neat idea - but IIRC, the
di
