RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question

2003-09-09 Thread Mike Kuentz (2)
20 PM To: Mike Kuentz (2) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question Mike Kuentz (2) writes: > I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using > ISO-8859, like this > > Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?b?SGFsZiBQcmljZWQgU2lsZGVuYWZpbCBDaXRyYXRl? &

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question

2003-09-09 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Kuentz (2) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question > > > I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using > ISO-8859, like this > >

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question

2003-09-09 Thread Justin Mason
Mike Kuentz (2) writes: > I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using > ISO-8859, like this > > Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?b?SGFsZiBQcmljZWQgU2lsZGVuYWZpbCBDaXRyYXRl? > which translates back to a subject of: > > Half Priced Sildenafil Citrate > > obviously I can look for "Hal

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question

2003-09-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:04 PM 9/9/2003 -0400, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: Does SA translate that before hand and that's why it's not hitting? Yes, QP and base64 are decoded. They are decoded so that they can't avoid SA's normal subject rules so easily. body rules also get html tags stripped and end-of-lines removed pr