Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-04 Thread Derek Broughton
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Derek Broughton wrote: > > DB> From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > DB> > they used to improve rules or just added the spam corpus? > DB> > DB> Aren't the two things synonymous? ;-) I'm sure that that is, at least, the > DB> inte

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Michael C. Berch
It seems to me that it would be useful to have a single repository of false negatives (i.e., stuff that slipped past SA) with some sort of automated process to crunch the messages to produce fodder for rules updates. This would be most useful for body tests, since people would be using all so

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Craig R Hughes
Derek Broughton wrote: DB> From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DB> > they used to improve rules or just added the spam corpus? DB> DB> Aren't the two things synonymous? ;-) I'm sure that that is, at least, the DB> intention. The sightings stuff mostly does not currently end

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Craig R Hughes
Richie Laager wrote: RL> On a related note, how can one send his spam collection to be RL> included in the spam corpus? Currently there are bandwidth/storage issues impinging on doing what I'd like to in this arena. I do have a couple feeds from other people's spamtraps which populate the corpu

RE: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Craig R Hughes
Honestly, nothing much most of the time. But the messages are archived, and provide a resource which people can go to if necessary. Occasionally I browse through and see if there's anything there which jumps out at me. Don't tell anyone, but the list is mostly there so that people don't bombard

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Derek Broughton
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless > > you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.) > > What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to spamassassin-sightings? > I have sent alot of

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Richie Laager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 03 May 2002 10:00 am, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to > spamassassin-sightings? I have sent alot of them but just > wonder if anything is done with them. Are they used to > improve

RE: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless > you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.) > What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to spamassassin-sightings? I have sent alot of them but just wonder if anything is done with them. Are they use

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Ken Causey
I want to apologize to everyone for my fumble here. I will be more careful in the future. Ken On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 09:25, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Ken Causey wrote: > > Not much to filter here, I reported it to razor as well as AOL. > > These should g

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: I have some exclusive information for you.]

2002-05-03 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Ken Causey wrote: > Not much to filter here, I reported it to razor as well as AOL. These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Working a