On 5 Jun 2003, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> The purpose of language is to communicate. Ambiguity is not
> communication.
Humans resolve ambiguity in communication all the time. In this case the
point was to resolve the ambiguity with the least paranoid interpretation.
Cf. "Enough with the conspi
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 03:29, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
>
> Re-read again.
>
> "When I send e-mail to some people [who are] using spamassassin [on their
> incoming mail, they write back to tell me] it gets flagged as spam ..."
>
How can someone *re*read something that was not there, i.e., [who ar
--On Thursday, June 5, 2003 3:29 AM -0700 Bart Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote:
OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today?
--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I send e-mail to some people usin
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote:
> OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today?
>
> --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin it gets flagged as
> > spam with the Forged-MUA-Outlook fl
--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here.
The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile. I know,
because I've followed up on it.
Anyway, I've fixed the FAQ now to list my address