Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-06 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 5 Jun 2003, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > The purpose of language is to communicate. Ambiguity is not > communication. Humans resolve ambiguity in communication all the time. In this case the point was to resolve the ambiguity with the least paranoid interpretation. Cf. "Enough with the conspi

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-06 Thread Robin Lynn Frank
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 03:29, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > Re-read again. > > "When I send e-mail to some people [who are] using spamassassin [on their > incoming mail, they write back to tell me] it gets flagged as spam ..." > How can someone *re*read something that was not there, i.e., [who ar

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-05 Thread Alan Leghart
--On Thursday, June 5, 2003 3:29 AM -0700 Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote: OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today? --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When I send e-mail to some people usin

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-05 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote: > OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today? > > --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin it gets flagged as > > spam with the Forged-MUA-Outlook fl

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-05 Thread Alan Leghart
--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here. The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile. I know, because I've followed up on it. Anyway, I've fixed the FAQ now to list my address