Title: Nachricht
Does anyone know if
it is possible to configure whitelists in such a way that spamassassin does not
further try to check the mail, i.e. if it finds a whitelist entry skips the
remaining tests altogether. In my opinion this would be a quite a timesaver. In
the current setup I
At 05:32 PM 12/29/2003, Shane Wegner wrote:
The sender address has manually been whitelisted for some
time and the first message he sent got a score of -100, and
the score has been falling. Does anyone know why the
auto-whitelist would penalise a manually whitelisted
address by 25 points?
What v
Alan Fullmer wrote:
Can anyone tell me why spam assassin is whitelisting everything at my
domain, even when it's not in the user_pref's file?
If it is, while it isn't for 99% of the admins who use it, I'd be
looking for a global misconfiguration in local.cf.
As always: "It doesn't work for me,"
went Doh!
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fullmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:21 AM
To: Alan Fullmer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] whitelists
Can anyone tell me why spam assassin is whitelisting everything at my
domain, even when it's not in the u
Can anyone tell me why spam assassin is whitelisting everything at my
domain, even when it's not in the user_pref's file?
thanks
Alan Fullmer
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on
Matt Kettler wrote on Mon, 09 Jun 2003 04:01:05 -0400:
> I'm not sure about spamass-milter, but some of the tools which call SA can
> be configured to do a true and absolute whitelisting based on the actual
> envelope recipient. I'm pretty sure I've read claims by amavisd-new and
> procmail set
This is the result of the way SA is invoked and the limited information
it's given when it runs. SA is designed as a standard message filter, so it
never sees the message delivery envelopes, just the headers and bodies.
Unless your MTA inserts header which tell who the actual recipient is, SA
h
I am currently running spamassassin through spamass-milter
in Sendmail. Working pretty good with the following exceptions. I have
several users listed to not have spam blocked using all_spam_to. If a message
is forwarded to them thus they are not apart of the TO, their spam will be
block
On 2002-11-29 11:36:19 +, Justin Mason wrote:
>those doco pages are generated from the
> CVS version, rather than 2.43.
Could that be changed please? It's irritating. :-)
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2003/
Rudy Rucker said:
> I saw something about auto_learn here:
> http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
> but could not find 'auto_learn' in any of the source files. What does
> autolearn do, I wonder?
It's not ready for use just yet -- those doco pages are generated from the
I saw something about auto_learn here:
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
but could not find 'auto_learn' in any of the source files. What does
autolearn do, I wonder?
oh, I tried setting auto_learn to 0 and 1 but that did not stop to LARGE
scores from creaping into t
I noticed I was starting to get more and more spam. Here is what happened:
[1] I have a couple of email addresses I have manually whitelisted, eg:
all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] Now, when john.doe gets a spam, the final socre is something like: -90
[3] The auto-whitelist adjusts the s
Hi,
I see that spamc/spamd supports storing the user prefs in MySQL.
I'm not using spamd, but rather 'spamassassin' called on a per user basis
from procmail. For conveneince I'd like to store the per user whitelists
in MySQL. I'm thinking of modifying spamassasin to do this. But I'm
wondering if
13 matches
Mail list logo
