I need to make some entries in whilist_from_rcvd. But the only hostnames in
the Received: header that I can trust, are not resolveable. Does that
matter? Is it a simple pattern/string match, or does SA also try to
resolve the hostname?
Like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] NTDOMAIN
>
>No not entirely, apologies aren't necessary perhaps its me being thick
>as a plank today
me, too.
>If mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can come from different mail servers
>@sprint, then surely you would need:
>
>whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] which would cover the host name.
>
This wou
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
Terry Milnes wrote:
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is
NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren't the same
domai
> Terry Milnes wrote:
> I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is
> NOT the same
> domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
> servers and owned by the same people.
I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren't the same
domain, th
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprintspectrum.com
Terry
Can you have multiple whitelist_from_rcvd line for the same domain? I
can't seem to get it to work or I am completely missing something. For
example Sprint will send from different mail hosts at different domains
(rDNS)
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
> Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the
> answer?
Mike,
I never did get a reply to my orignal post. But I did find a work around to
the whitelist_rcvd_from not working with my implementation of postfix/SA. I
ended up adding my own custom hea
Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the
answer?
-Original Message-
From: Cowles, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.
Mike Kuentz
Title: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.
From the docs:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addresses with a check
against the Received headers. The first parameter is the address to
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
> To properly add the sender into whitelist_from_rcvd should it be
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 63.83.98.169
>
> since they don't have reverse DNS set up? If not what should it be?
> unknown is right before the IP address in brackets, but it's not a
> domain n
] whitelist_from_rcvd
question
spamassassin-tal
k-admin
At 02:59 PM 6/18/2003 -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com
[209.11.17.108])
by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id
h5IJZO0q028359
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed 18 Jun 2003 12:35:24 -0700
"unys-2.n
We get mail that I want to whitelist using whitelist_from_rcvd. The
Received header I am trying to match is like this:
Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com
[209.11.17.108])
by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id
h5IJZO0q028359
for <[EMA
13 matches
Mail list logo
