Re: [SAtalk] What is this? Bayes poison?

2003-12-06 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, December 05, 2003 12:54 AM -0600 David B Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that message was MIME "multipart/alternative", but yet I saw only > the part that was obvious Bayes poison. Is it possible that your > MIME 'sanitizer' removed the spam 'payload' component? > (Or it's just

Re: [SAtalk] What is this? Bayes poison?

2003-12-04 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I'm getting a bunch of these. Are these just intended to poison Bayes DB's? > What's the sender's objective? > > Forwarded Message > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from 212.199.108.10.forward.012.net.il > (212.199.

[SAtalk] What is this? Bayes poison?

2003-12-04 Thread Kenneth Porter
I'm getting a bunch of these. Are these just intended to poison Bayes DB's? What's the sender's objective? Forwarded Message Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 212.199.108.10.forward.012.net.il (212.199.108.10.forward.012.net.il [212.199.108.10]) by s

Re: [SAtalk] What is this?

2002-06-04 Thread Doug Crompton
I take it this is corrected in CVS. Is it just a typo? Can I just correct it? Take the source for this module from CVS? Doug On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Bryan Hoover wrote: > Doug Crompton wrote: > > > SA has been running great here for 2 months. I am very happy with it's > > > > performance. In the

Re: [SAtalk] What is this?

2002-06-03 Thread Bryan Hoover
Doug Crompton wrote: > SA has been running great here for 2 months. I am very happy with it's > > performance. In the last week I have gooten the following error > message > twice. Can anyone fill me in on what and why this is? > > >From a mailstat log of procmail... > > Total Average Number F

Re: [SAtalk] What is this?

2002-06-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:45:37PM -0400, Doug Crompton wrote: > > SA has been running great here for 2 months. I am very happy with it's > performance. In the last week I have gooten the following error message > twice. Can anyone fill me in on what and why this is? > It's a known bug fixed in

[SAtalk] What is this?

2002-06-03 Thread Doug Crompton
SA has been running great here for 2 months. I am very happy with it's performance. In the last week I have gooten the following error message twice. Can anyone fill me in on what and why this is? >From a mailstat log of procmail... Total Average Number Folder - --- -- --

Re: [SAtalk] what is this

2002-02-25 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:54:32PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote: > procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM" > procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers" > procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL" > procmail: Executing "spamassassin,-P" > procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM" > procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.pr

Re: [SAtalk] what is this

2002-02-25 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Landy Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "spam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:54 AM Subject: [SAtalk] what is this > Failed to run header SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: In string, > @cs now must b

[SAtalk] what is this

2002-02-25 Thread Landy Roman
procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM" procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers" procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL" procmail: Executing "spamassassin,-P" procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM" procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers" procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL" procmail: Executin