Re: [SAtalk] user-prefs

2003-10-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:41 AM 10/8/03 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: "Failed to create default user preference file //.spamassassin/user_prefs" Sounds like you're using spamd and spamc, and not passing -u to either. In this case, spamd will fall back to the user "nobody" and try to use that home directory for the u

[SAtalk] user-prefs

2003-10-07 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
Hi List. For some reason my user prefs file keeps disappearing. Has anyone else had this problem? Any pointers in the right direction would be appreciated. "Failed to create default user preference file //.spamassassin/user_prefs" Regards, Tom Kinghorn --

Re: [SAtalk] user prefs file

2003-08-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:35:40PM -0700, David Shaw wrote: > I'm new to spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin and sendmail installed > from redhat 9. I also have Mailscanner installed. It looks like > spamassassin doesn't look at the users user_prefs file. Is there a way > to configure spamassassin

[SAtalk] user prefs file

2003-08-14 Thread David Shaw
Hello All, I'm new to spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin and sendmail installed from redhat 9. I also have Mailscanner installed. It looks like spamassassin doesn't look at the users user_prefs file. Is there a way to configure spamassassin to look at the user_prefs file? Thanks, David

RE: [SAtalk] user prefs file

2003-08-14 Thread Ian Douglas
> I'm new to spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin and sendmail installed > from redhat 9. I also have Mailscanner installed. It looks like > spamassassin doesn't look at the users user_prefs file. Is there a way > to configure spamassassin to look at the user_prefs file? The MailScanner.conf file

RE: [SAtalk] user prefs file {Scanned}

2003-08-14 Thread David Shaw
Thank you, I was able to edit Mailscanner and add to the list. Thanks, David On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 13:51, Ian Douglas wrote: > > I'm new to spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin and sendmail installed > > from redhat 9. I also have Mailscanner installed. It looks like > > spamassassin doesn't look