m Borland
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Training based on previously detected spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Graham,
Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote:
GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or
bad id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Graham,
Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote:
GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or
bad idea
GB> to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained
tests, or is
GB> that a waste of time
At 10:21 AM 12/11/2003, Graham Borland wrote:
I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea
to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is
that a waste of time? Should I only train it with spam which is currently
managing to slip through?
W
I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea
to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is
that a waste of time? Should I only train it with spam which is currently
managing to slip through?
--
Graham Borland
At 11:45 PM 12/9/03 -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
Oh yeah, forgot to mention I finally got around to migrating all the FAQ
stuff onto the Wiki ;)
Heh, yeah, I caused me to go "Where the heck is that FAQ link???!!!" for
about 5 seconds before I saw the wiki one..
Ok, my real impressions were a little
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
>and then the Bayes FAQ in the Wiki:
>http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/BayesFaq
>in particular:
>http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/SiteWideBayesFeedback
>and:
>http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/UsingAnAccountForLearning
Oh yeah, forgot t
At 02:01 AM 12/10/03 -0500, kittonian wrote:
Since the clients all download the mail and it becomes stored on the
exchange server for the user's inbox, how exactly do I train SA to stop
marking certain items? Our users are all over the place so if there's
something I can setup where I can have
Title: Message
Our setup contains
qmail with SA on a linux server for pop/smtp and a corporate exchange server
running on win2k with which each client accesses all of their e-mail (exchange
and pop accounts). Most of the stuff is working just fine with SA tagging
e-mails but there are some
Our email server is Post.Office 3.5.3 for MacOS X. The clients that
access this server are a mixture of Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft
Entourage(MacOS), and Mozilla Thunderbird. Is there anyone familiar with
setting up the Post.Office Spamassassin plugin so that the various
clients can train the
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:39:42AM +, Martyn Drake wrote:
> I was wondering how I can use sa-learn to train a system-wide Bayesian
> database? The way I've set-up SA at the moment is that each user has a
> .forward file which runs "|/usr/bin/procmail -f-" and that in turn reads
> the .pro
Hi,
I was wondering how I can use sa-learn to train a system-wide Bayesian
database? The way I've set-up SA at the moment is that each user has a
.forward file which runs "|/usr/bin/procmail -f-" and that in turn reads
the .procmailrc file containing the recipie to forward the mail to
spamc.
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Evan Platt wrote:
> --On Friday, November 07, 2003 12:06 PM -0800 Jeff Lasman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What's likely to happen if I run these 563 spams without running any
> > hams?
>
> I thought I recall the help file stating that running HAMS without SPAM (or
>
--On Friday, November 07, 2003 12:06 PM -0800 Jeff Lasman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since my original training a few weeks ago I've gotten 563 spams in my
> "spamuncaught" folder for further bayes training.
>
> What I don't have, is 500 or so ham emails that haven't been run through
> befo
Since my original training a few weeks ago I've gotten 563 spams in my
"spamuncaught" folder for further bayes training.
What I don't have, is 500 or so ham emails that haven't been run through
before.
What's likely to happen if I run these 563 spams without running any
hams?
I do have lots o
Lucas Albers wrote:
Their is another potential method you could use.
Use the isbg.py imap python script to access the folders via imap and
learn the spam.
http://www.rogerbinns.com/isbg/
You could also use winbind to use the correcut NT usernames for the imap
connection from the linux box.
http://
Their is another potential method you could use.
Use the isbg.py imap python script to access the folders via imap and
learn the spam.
http://www.rogerbinns.com/isbg/
You could also use winbind to use the correcut NT usernames for the imap
connection from the linux box.
http://nic-ks.greatplains.n
I have kind of the same problem... I want my HAM to be sa-learned into
sa but the messages are on a store other then the Linux box, and
forwarding them will seem as if they are coming from an internal legit user.
What format of file does sa-learn expect and disect ?
-Maciek
PS Francisco, sorry t
Hi:
I'm running SA 2.54 in a redhat 7.2 linux box with sendmail-milter.
This box is a filter between external MTA's and a Exchange server.
I have everything working (SA, bayes & razor) and I was trying to use
whatever spam users have in their mailboxes to train SA. So using a small VB
pr
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:16:09PM +0100, Stefan Seiz wrote:
> My guess is that sa-learnspam will filter out and ignore the spamassassin
> specific header and subject prefix, but i am not sure about it (haven't
> found anything in the docs either).
From a quick look at the code, cleaning will happ
Hi,
Are there any issues training the bayes corpus on spam which already went
through SA and has a modified subject and includes the SA report in the
header?
My guess is that sa-learnspam will filter out and ignore the spamassassin
specific header and subject prefix, but i am not sure about it (ha
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:22:20AM -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
> Is it possible to train SA 2.43 with known spam like sa-learn-spam does in
> SA 2.50?
2.43 doesn't have any "learning" rules. 2.50 has a bayes-ish system
which is what sa-learn-spam trains.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
How do I type
Is it possible to train SA 2.43 with known spam like sa-learn-spam does in
SA 2.50?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-tal
22 matches
Mail list logo
