emarkable.
I'd love to hear whether you figured it out or have any other ideas as to
how to troubleshoot.
1k thx - ekkis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cheryl L. Southard
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Hi,
Well, I gotten another 4 more of these spamd processes stuck on my
mail server since yesterday, all with the same user. In running the
solaris pstack program, it appears that the spamd processes are stuck
in the ham_func5 and memcopy routines called from ham_expand_table
and ham_split_page.
Hi All,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:06:44PM -0800, Bob Amen wrote:
> > Another idea, are you using Bayes, and if so do you not have
> > bayes_learn_to_journal enabled?
I tried turning "bayes_learn_to_yournal" on for that particular user and
some of his spamd processes are still getting stuck. I r
Hi List,
> I'm sorry if I gave you the wrong impression, if you are using Bayes with
> auto_learn (auto_learn 1), then you most likely -do- want
> bayes_learn_to_journal set to 1. (enabled).
Sorry David, got tired last night (been banging my head against this for a
few days), I meant i set it to
> Pete
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan
> Tappin
> Sent: 04 December 2003 16:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
>
>
> I am running SA on OS X 10.
David B Funk wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Cheryl L. Southard wrote:
Hi All,
I've got two spamd processes that just wont go away. They've been
running for well over 11 hours and are taking up 100% of my cpu.
One idea, there's something in the mail that particular user is getting
that is triggerin
MAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Pete Henshall wrote:
>
> > Hi dan, list,
> >
> > > I think it's simply a function of load. The first system gets the bulk of
> > the mail thoug
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Pete Henshall wrote:
> Hi dan, list,
>
> > I think it's simply a function of load. The first system gets the bulk of
> the mail thoughput. You can see that the > erratic loads
> > tail off over the weekend. It's wierd. I have tried disabling RBL, bayes
> and even removing al
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Henshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
>
>
> Hi dan, list,
>
> > I think
Hi dan, list,
> I think it's simply a function of load. The first system gets the bulk of
the mail thoughput. You can see that the > erratic loads
> tail off over the weekend. It's wierd. I have tried disabling RBL, bayes
and even removing all my third party
> rules. No dice.
If it is still l
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete
> Henshall
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
>
>
>
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Cheryl L. Southard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've got two spamd processes that just wont go away. They've been
> running for well over 11 hours and are taking up 100% of my cpu.
> I've run "truss " but it doesn't report anything. The same
> user, coincidentally, is the recipient o
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan
Tappin
Sent: 04 December 2003 16:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
I am running SA on OS X 10.2.8 and I have the same issue. I get the same
one or two spamd processing just sitting there. I also
eventually nee
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cheryl L. Southard
Sent: 04 December 2003 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
Hi All,
I've got two spamd processes that just wont go away. They've been
running for well over 11 hours and are taking up 100% of m
ir??
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Cheryl L. Southard
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi All,
I've got two spamd processes that just wont go away. They've been
running for well over 11 hours and are taking up 100% of my cpu.
I've run "truss " but it doesn't report anything. The same
user, coincidentally, is the recipient of both e-mails, but this
user doesn't have any special rul
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:32:49PM -, Pete Henshall wrote:
> Are there spamc processes accessing them??
No. My spamc processes time out after 600 seconds, so they've finished up
hours ago after they delivered their e-mails.
> - what is in that userpref file?
There are only comments in this u
17 matches
Mail list logo
