[SAtalk] spamd problem

Hi, I just switched my setup from spamassassin to spamd/spamc, started spamd with OPTIONS="-d -c -a -D" in my /etc/sysconfig/spamd file. Redhat 8 spamd 2.55 I seem to have a permissions problem pointed out in /var/log/maillog: - from log: Sep 22 13:50:29 gizmo spamd[8211]: server start

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problem with razor2

* Oliver Egginger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Try restarting spamd. > Thanks, but that turns out not to be necessary. I re-ran razor-admin -discover on Kelson's suggestion, and things are fine now. Cam -- Cam Ellison Ph.D. R.Psych. From Roberts Creek on B.C.'s incomparable Sunshine Coast cam(

[SAtalk] Spamd problem with razor2

I'm running SA 2.55, razor 2.22, and exim 4.10 on a Debian testing/unstable box. Until recently, it was working fine, but now spamd consistently produces a timeout when trying to access the razor servers. Specifically, Ping.pm is what craps out: Jun 15 04:56:31 treehouse spamd[417]: razor2 check

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd-Problem...

Ullrich Groh wrote: Hy there, I just installed (for the first time) SA 2.43 on our AIX 4.3 mail-server. Perl is 5.005_03. The SA itself seems to be running very good. What makes a problem is spamd/spamc. In principle it is up and running: but only for E-Mail smaller than approx. 250 kB. Anyt

[SAtalk] Spamd-Problem...

Hy there, I just installed (for the first time) SA 2.43 on our AIX 4.3 mail-server. Perl is 5.005_03. The SA itself seems to be running very good. What makes a problem is spamd/spamc. In principle it is up and running: but only for E-Mail smaller than approx. 250 kB. Anything above 250 kB goes

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

course, maybe I have a faulty memory) Thanks, Jay Hodges Draco Digital - Original Message - From: "Paul Rushing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:36 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem > > > > Doesn't s

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

> > Doesn't seem to be working how? Try spamd -D -q and let us know what it says... > spamd won't consider -q without -x try spamd -D -x -q -- = Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Sponsored by http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

Draco Digital, LLC http://www.dracodigital.com http://www.luv2goshop.com - Original Message - From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jay Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [SAta

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

Jay Hodges wrote: > running spamd as daemon with -d flag only. > > If user config files exist and the SQL database exists which one has a > higher priority for settings? with only the "-d" flag, spamd won't ever consider SQL settings. > Also, -q does not seem to be working, (spamd is not acces

[SAtalk] Spamd problem when slocal used in .forward?

I am having a strange problem: our users that are using slocal (from nmh) in their .forward files do not have their email messages go through SpamAssassin. Note that their mail does cget correctly processed by our milters (we have two). Deleting their .forward fixes the .problem. The .forward