[SAtalk] spamd -D option request in future release

2004-01-01 Thread Steve Heggood
I run spamd with -D from time to time in order to run statistic gathering tools on my /var/log/maillog. Debug currently runs at two levels, all or none. It would be nice if one could selectively turn on debugging at a modular level. For example, for me, it would be rare that I would want to see

RE: [SAtalk] spamd -d from the command line or the spamassassin script?

2003-08-24 Thread Kai MacTane
At 8/23/03 08:18 PM , Greg Ennis wrote: Why do you limit spamd to 4 processes? Because my mail server is painfully underpowered and spamd seems to place a fair amount of load on it -- see my other recent message about "dealing with huge mail floods"; it gives some of the specs. Basically, when I

RE: [SAtalk] spamd -d from the command line or the spamassassin script?

2003-08-24 Thread Greg Ennis
At 8/23/03 04:10 PM , Greg Ennis wrote: >...when I boot the system spamd is started and I get no failure notice in >the logs, but when I look for it as a process after about 30 seconds it is >gone. When I use /etc/init.d/spamassassin start to activate it again it >dies again. The only way I can

Re: [SAtalk] spamd -d from the command line or the spamassassin script?

2003-08-24 Thread Kai MacTane
At 8/23/03 04:10 PM , Greg Ennis wrote: ...when I boot the system spamd is started and I get no failure notice in the logs, but when I look for it as a process after about 30 seconds it is gone. When I use /etc/init.d/spamassassin start to activate it again it dies again. The only way I can g

[SAtalk] spamd -d from the command line or the spamassassin script?

2003-08-23 Thread Greg Ennis
Everyone, I have been trying to tweak my spamassassin 2.31 that came with Red Hat 8.0 and noticed that it was not filtering the mail sometimes. I have activated spamd/spamc with the spamassassin script that comes with RED HAT. The observation I have made is that when I boot the system spamd is

Re: [SAtalk] spamd -D

2002-11-23 Thread Dark Alchemist
Dark Alchemist wrote: > > I noticed a few people on the net and 1 in this group and now me that > have to use spamd with the -D debug option on or our messages are never > parsed. Is there a reason for this as it makes the maillog quite large. > > I tried everything I could think of over here to

[SAtalk] spamd -D

2002-11-22 Thread Dark Alchemist
I noticed a few people on the net and 1 in this group and now me that have to use spamd with the -D debug option on or our messages are never parsed. Is there a reason for this as it makes the maillog quite large. I tried everything I could think of over here to no avail. I tried contacting seve