Re: [SAtalk] spamc message size limits

2002-06-13 Thread Matt Sergeant
Jason Haar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:18:51AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote: > >>Looking at the source for spamc, it looks to me like a message that exceeds >>the maximum message size is simply skipped entirely, which actually requires >>reading in most of the message first - fair enough, as

Re: [SAtalk] spamc message size limits

2002-06-12 Thread Jason Haar
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:18:51AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote: > Looking at the source for spamc, it looks to me like a message that exceeds > the maximum message size is simply skipped entirely, which actually requires > reading in most of the message first - fair enough, as it's hard to > determin

[SAtalk] spamc message size limits

2002-06-10 Thread Pete Hanson
Forgive me if this has been asked in the past. Looking at the source for spamc, it looks to me like a message that exceeds the maximum message size is simply skipped entirely, which actually requires reading in most of the message first - fair enough, as it's hard to determine the size when it'