On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 23:32, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> James Braid said:
> > > > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons
> > > > and > > > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> > >
> > > On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
> >
> > I t
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 22:31, James Braid wrote:
> > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons
> and
> > > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> >
> > On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
>
> I think he means this juniper: http://www.ob
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 18:35, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > Well the idea came from the Linux Journal article a while back.
>
>
> Which issue was that?
Issue 92 see: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4882
> My problem with Perl as a mail server was not so muc
James Braid said:
> > > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons
> > > and > > > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> >
> > On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
>
> I think he means this juniper: http://www.obtuse.com/juniper/ :-)
a
> I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons
and
> > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
>
> On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
I think he means this juniper: http://www.obtuse.com/juniper/ :-)
Cheers, James
--
Ian MacDougall said:
> I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons and
> spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
BTW please post it to the news site
(http://news.spamassassin.zawodny.com/) if possible, th
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:43, Kim Leandersson wrote:
> Yes! This could be exactly what I'm looking for. We wish to deploy an
> SMTP gateway who will filter all mail for spam and viruses. We have
> multiple domains, does your configuration manage this? Is there a way to
> also scan the mails for viru
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:31, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
>
> > Hello, (sorry for the disclaimer)
> >
> > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons and
> > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> > Would this system be worth documenting and making availab
Hello, (sorry for the disclaimer)
I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons and
spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
The reasons for using smtpd and not spampd were:
1) This system will potentially be the first MX in the chain.
2) I wanted a bit more control over
