On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > sendmail.cf
> >
> > #
> > # Format of headers #
> > #
> >
> > blah
> > blah
> >
> > HX-Envelope-From: $g
> > HX-Envelope-To: $u
>
> Most Excellent!!! Works li
On 11 Jul 2003, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:27, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
> > >Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> > >
> > > > >sendmail.cf
[snip..]
> > > > >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> > > > >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> > > > >
On 10 Jul 2003, Yorkshire Dave said:
> HX-Envelope-From: $g
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
This adds the header even to mail that's being relayed on and not
locally delivered.
If you don't want that, something like
H?l?X-Envelope-Sender: $g
will do the trick.
--
`We cannot get a new line down the pipe
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:27, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
> >Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >
> > > >sendmail.cf
> > > >
> > > >#
> > > ># Format of headers #
> > > >#
> > > >
> > > >blah
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I did try adding those headers on a test server to
> see if it does work, and it does, $u actually puts <> around the email
> address by itself and $g doesnt, so for them to look consistent, you
want
>
> HX-Envelope-From: <$g>
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >sendmail.cf
> >
> >#
> ># Format of headers #
> >#
> >
> >blah
> >blah
> >
> >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> >
> >if i recall correctl
Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >sendmail.cf
> >
> >#
> ># Format of headers #
> >#
> >
> >blah
> >blah
> >
> >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> >
> >if i recall correctly :)
>
> Looks plausable, as $g is in Ret
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any special reason you need the Envelope-Recipient ? If you run
SA
> from the local delivery agent you already know who the recipient is when
> procmail is called, if you run SA from a filter like Mimedefang then
there
> are potentially *mul
Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> sendmail.cf
>
> #
> # Format of headers #
> #
>
> blah
> blah
>
> HX-Envelope-From: $g
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
Most Excellent!!! Works like a champ! Anybody have the sendmail.mc
format? I've got my mi
At 23:03 10/07/03 +0100, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 22:08, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
> configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
> headers?
>
> If so, how does one get SendMail to create them?
>
se
At 17:08 10/07/03 -0400, Dan O'Brien wrote:
Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
headers?
No it doesn't.
However it does create a "Return-Path" header that is the same as what
would be in X-Envelope-Fro
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 22:08, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
> configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
> headers?
>
> If so, how does one get SendMail to create them?
>
sendmail.cf
#
# Fo
Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
headers?
If so, how does one get SendMail to create them?
Thanks,
Dan O'Brien
__
Axon Solutions, Inc.
13 matches
Mail list logo