IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt
> At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
> >doesnt register as spam ??
> >
> >hits = 1
There's something screwy with your installation. The
MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE rule doesn't exist in 2.55.
Dr. Ongo wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3
tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, REMOVE_SUBJ
X-Spam-Level: **
version 2.55
--
, May 30, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt
> At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
> >doesnt register as spam ??
> >
> >hits = 1.7
> >
> >shou
At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote:
Hello
if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
doesnt register as spam ??
hits = 1.7
should it be recognised as spam ?
What version are you on? What were the hits?
Myne scored a 4.3 with just the body (not headers):
X-Spam
Hello
if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
doesnt register as spam ??
hits = 1.7
should it be recognised as spam ?
Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on
ECTED] Behalf Of
> > Roddie Hasan
> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:10 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt scoring low
> >
> >
> > I just upgraded from 2.43 to 2.50 (using spamc/spamd), and when I tested
>
Interesting, have you linted your configfile? sounds like your spamassassin
configs are messed up and it's not parsing all your rules.
I get a MUCH higher score, and even without and DNSBLs and Razor it's
still over 5.0. I get 10.40 for a normal run, and 8.90 for a -L run.
Here's my detailed r
