At Sun Dec 21 20:04:48 2003, Amnon wrote:
>
> Since I didn't get any replies to my question about replacing the
> .cf files in /usr/share/spamassassin with the newer ones that are on
> the SA site (running ver. 2.60), I decided to try it anyway. Well
> no errors, log looks fine, and spam is being
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 03:04:48PM -0500, Amnon wrote:
> So I guess one cannot just replace the .cf files with newer ones, right?
Can, with some kluging. Want to? Probably not. Most rule changes take
place via code than via the cf files.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I can't believe I ate th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 21 December 2003 12:04 pm, Amnon wrote:
> So I guess one cannot just replace the .cf files with newer ones, right?
not sure what version you are using but it would appear not. On a side not
when I upgraded my servers to using 2.60 I found it
Since I didn't get any replies to my question about replacing the .cf files in
/usr/share/spamassassin with the newer ones that are on the SA site (running
ver. 2.60), I decided to try it anyway. Well no errors, log looks fine, and
spam is being flaged. That is until. Later on in the day I n
