On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:10:59PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> Does all the mail that originates inside your network have to be relayed
> through your mail servers? If so, consider setting up a separate
> mail relay that doesn't run SpamAssassin and is only accessible from
> within your network, the
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:16:32PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> I want to protect mail that originates inside our network. Such
> mail carries return addresses from many different domains. In
> addition, there is no requirement that mail with a panix.com return
> address must originate inside ou
You can whitelist anything from *@panix.com, etc.
I wouldn't recommend doing so, though. This would allow spammers to fake
the @panix.com in their From: lines, allowing the spam to get in more
easily.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> Hello spam assassins,
> Panix is about to deplo
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:05:56PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> Why not just whitelist *@panix.com? That should handle exactly what you
> want.
I want to protect mail that originates inside our network. Such
mail carries return addresses from many different domains. In
addition, there is
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:47:59PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> Hello spam assassins,
> Panix is about to deploy spamassassin on a fairly wide scale.
[snip]
Why not just whitelist *@panix.com? That should handle exactly what you
want.
--
Ross Vandegrift
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Pope has a Water
Hello spam assassins,
Panix is about to deploy spamassassin on a fairly wide scale.
We'd like to find a way to protect mail originated inside Panix
from being flagged by SA, without the sender having to do anything
special. My approach to this so far has focused on the Received
header:
header O
