On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:18:25PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > >
> > > > spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is
> > > > wi
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:18:25PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> >
> > > spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is
> > > with the -S setting on or off, with auto-whitelist on or
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:18:25PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
>
> > spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is
> > with the -S setting on or off, with auto-whitelist on or off.
> >
> > They sit there sucking up CPU like th
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is
> with the -S setting on or off, with auto-whitelist on or off.
>
> They sit there sucking up CPU like there is no tomorrow.
>
> Went back to an older spamd, all is well.
>
> I'll
spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is
with the -S setting on or off, with auto-whitelist on or off.
They sit there sucking up CPU like there is no tomorrow.
Went back to an older spamd, all is well.
I'll try to troubleshoot this over the weekend.
I'm using F
