On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:18:25PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote: > > > spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is > > with the -S setting on or off, with auto-whitelist on or off. > > > > They sit there sucking up CPU like there is no tomorrow. > > > > Went back to an older spamd, all is well. > > > > I'll try to troubleshoot this over the weekend. > > > > I'm using FreeBSD 4.5-stable. > > > > Can somebody think of another socket-serving perl daemon that spawns > > children and is reasonably portable? I'm just surprised that this > > continues to be a problem ... > > You know, I'm halfway wondering if this is a FreeBSD/Perl issue. > > I think I was wrong; I'm starting to see the spamd-doesn't-get-reaped > issue with my older spamd too. I did cvsup & make FreeBSD last night. >
Try the -m patch at bug 78 with -m set to something ridiculously high. The -m patch has a different SIGCHLD handler. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk