On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:18:25PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> 
> > spamd from last night sometimes doesn't always reap its children; This is
> > with the -S setting on or off, with auto-whitelist on or off.
> >
> > They sit there sucking up CPU like there is no tomorrow.
> >
> > Went back to an older spamd, all is well.
> >
> > I'll try to troubleshoot this over the weekend.
> >
> > I'm using FreeBSD 4.5-stable.
> >
> > Can somebody think of another socket-serving perl daemon that spawns
> > children and is reasonably portable? I'm just surprised that this
> > continues to be a problem ...
> 
> You know, I'm halfway wondering if this is a FreeBSD/Perl issue.
> 
> I think I was wrong; I'm starting to see the spamd-doesn't-get-reaped
> issue with my older spamd too. I did cvsup & make FreeBSD last night.
> 

Try the -m patch at bug 78 with -m set to something ridiculously high. The
-m patch has a different SIGCHLD handler.

-- 
Duncan Findlay

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to