Re: [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules

2002-03-25 Thread Ben Jackson
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 16:02, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > > body EYES_ONLY /(?:if you are not the addressee|privileged.{0,30}confidential)/i > > > describe EYES_ONLY Tries to sound like you intercepted something secret (bjj) > > > score EYES_ONLY 2 > > > > I get a lot of pe

Re: [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules

2002-03-25 Thread Craig R Hughes
Bart Schaefer wrote: > > body EYES_ONLY /(?:if you are not the addressee|privileged.{0,30}confidential)/i > > describe EYES_ONLY Tries to sound like you intercepted something secret (bjj) > > score EYES_ONLY 2 > > I get a lot of perfectly innocent email that has this sort of disclaimer, > usuall

Re: [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules

2002-03-25 Thread Bart Schaefer
I know this is from a few days ago ... On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Ben Jackson wrote: > # These are spamware as far as I can tell. > header SPAMWARE_0 X-Mailer =~ /Delano e-Business Interaction Server|Accucast / > describe SPAMWARE_0 Bulk email software fingerprints found in headers (0) (bjj) > score S

[SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules

2002-03-22 Thread Ben Jackson
This is a subset of the rules I've added to catch spam that's gotten into my inbox. Round scores are probably wholly made up. Others were probably chosen to make a certain message hit 5.0. # I hate "newsletters" with a passion. I could reduce this to one `full' # rule to avoid double-billing,