Re: [SAtalk] need help with some spam

2003-08-17 Thread Matt Kettler
I wouldn't bother messing with other rules, In this example you've clearly been hit by the famous bug 1589, which has long since been fixed. The rule REFERENCES has a massive negative score (it's something like -6) That rule right there as acting as a whitelist for this message. Without it this

[SAtalk] need help with some spam

2003-08-17 Thread landy
lately some spam is penetratingwith a 3.5 score, other then reducing the score how could i be able to have SA tag this mail as spam i.e the from address had this : [EMAIL PROTECTED] and these were the results below the tests are the test theemail failed? if so how could i make no real_name >