Skye Poier wrote on Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:07:42 -0800:
> ^Tload: 0.03 cmd: perl 4643 [nanslp] 1.69u 0.27s 7% 13044k
> ^Tload: 0.03 cmd: perl 4643 [nanslp] 1.69u 0.27s 6% 13044k
>
I seem to have the same problem with a milter -> spamd solution which
only waits ten seconds for spamd to respond. Aft
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:07:42PM -0800, Skye Poier wrote:
> I get a very large delay in testing the message:
> However if I use the -L option there is no delay:
>
> I'm running this on a server with a permanent, direct connection to the
> internet. I'm not seeing any other problems (mail, web,
That was the problem. Thanks!!
Skye
Word on the street is Theo Van Dinter said:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:07:42PM -0800, Skye Poier wrote:
> > I get a very large delay in testing the message:
> > However if I use the -L option there is no delay:
> >
> > I'm running this on a server with a pe
Hello Assassins!
Fresh spamassassin 2.43 install here, with perl v5.8.0 on FreeBSD
While doing the test from the INSTALL doc for use with procmail, doing:
% spamassassin -D -t < test.notspam > notspam.out
I get a very large delay in testing the message:
debug: using "/usr/local/share/spamassas
