Re: [SAtalk] lint difference in 2.60

2003-10-19 Thread Keith C. Ivey
Bob Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BA> /b is a word boundary; like ^ and $, it's a "zero-width > assertion", BA> looking for "a spot between two characters that > has a "\w" on one BA> side of it and a "\W" on the other side of > it" (from `perldoc perlre`) > > As a word boundary, would no

Re: [SAtalk] lint difference in 2.60

2003-10-19 Thread Bob Menschel
Hello Bob, Saturday, October 18, 2003, 9:04:18 AM, you responded to my query: >> > spamassassin --lint >> returns with no errors on the two 2.55 systems. However, starting with >> the migration to 2.60 on the third system, lint with the same user_prefs >> gives: >> > Quantifier unexpected on zero

Re: [SAtalk] lint difference in 2.60

2003-10-19 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:00:18 -0700 Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I manage three domains which are hosted on three different servers by the > same hosting company, all of which use SpamAssassin. Last night, one of > the servers was migrated from SA 2.55 to SA 2.60 > > I am usin

[SAtalk] lint difference in 2.60

2003-10-18 Thread Robert Menschel
I manage three domains which are hosted on three different servers by the same hosting company, all of which use SpamAssassin. Last night, one of the servers was migrated from SA 2.55 to SA 2.60 I am using the same user_prefs file on all three systems. > spamassassin --lint returns with no errors