Simon Byrnand wrote on Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:17:35 +1200:
> I can't quite see a scenario that would cause that, except maybe forwarded
> messages that are showing all headers hmm.. :)
>
Bounces containing the headers of messages coming from your machines?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germa
Simon Byrnand writes:
>0.0000280700 non-token data: nspam
>0.0000448940 non-token data: nham
>0.0000 1027800 non-token data: ntokens
>0.0000143410 non-token data: oldest age
>0.0000536210 non-tok
Nope, only one secondary, and it runs the same version of Sendmail.
(Changed to 8.11.6p2 a while back, but slightly after the bayes database
was already learning)
Err, to be clearer, both primary and secondary were updated at the same time.
Alternatively, what's the token counts for that token?
At 21:55 30/06/03 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Simon Byrnand writes:
>Just browsing through my bayes database and I see
>
>debug: bayes token '8.11.6' => 0.0186046511627907
>
>Presumably it has grabbed the 8.11.6 from our sendmail version which is in
>all message headers processed by our server ?
>
Simon Byrnand writes:
>Just browsing through my bayes database and I see
>
>debug: bayes token '8.11.6' => 0.0186046511627907
>
>Presumably it has grabbed the 8.11.6 from our sendmail version which is in
>all message headers processed by our server ?
>
>Which begs the question, why has bayes lear
Just browsing through my bayes database and I see
debug: bayes token '8.11.6' => 0.0186046511627907
Presumably it has grabbed the 8.11.6 from our sendmail version which is in
all message headers processed by our server ?
Which begs the question, why has bayes learnt that 8.11.6 is a ham
indica
