On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:03:17AM -0400, Chris Leahy wrote:
> Local testing (ie: spamassassin -t spam.txt) yields consistant results.
> Higher as well.
Well, that's not local testing. That's just adding a report.
"spamassassin -L" is local-only.
> Would those reduce the score? A local test yi
Local testing (ie: spamassassin -t spam.txt) yields consistant results.
Higher as well.
Perhaps its the network thing thats being strange.
Would those reduce the score? A local test yields a different score from
a network score.
Is this normal?
>>
>>
>
>Messages should always get the same
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:29:52AM -0400, Chris Leahy wrote:
> 1. A LOT more spam is getting through undetected.
2.4 has a heavy no-false positive bias. The scores in 2.42 should
help out a bit. :) (I've seen a few more false negatives with 2.4,
but very few...)
> 3. Identical messages yield
Hello all,
I have a FreeBSD machine running sendmail with mailscanner. Mailscanner
is a virus/spam filtering package
that uses Spamassassin.
I was working with SA version 2.20 and it was pretty effective.
I upgraded to 2.41 and now I'm seeing some strange things.
1. A LOT more spam is getting t
