Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 2 September 2003 at 10:01:21 -0400
> From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is anybody working on a rule for lots of garbage words in email? Now,
> > if I were a spammer I'd pick real words out of a dictionary, which is
> > easy eno
check www.exit0.us in the random letters section. Fred's have been working
great.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] garbage
>
>
> I
At 12:16 PM 9/1/2003 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I've been seeing more and more spam using sequences of garbage
character strings; I'm guessing to get around Bayesian filtering?
Also the obfuscating comments seem to contain garbage strings, but the
existing rule finds those pretty well.
Is anyb
I've been seeing more and more spam using sequences of garbage
character strings; I'm guessing to get around Bayesian filtering?
Also the obfuscating comments seem to contain garbage strings, but the
existing rule finds those pretty well.
Is anybody working on a rule for lots of garbage words in