I've been seeing more and more spam using sequences of garbage character strings; I'm guessing to get around Bayesian filtering? Also the obfuscating comments seem to contain garbage strings, but the existing rule finds those pretty well.
Is anybody working on a rule for lots of garbage words in email? Now, if I were a spammer I'd pick real words out of a dictionary, which is easy enough to do, but since they *do* seem to be using strings of garbage words at the moment.... -- David Dyer-Bennet, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <noguns-nomoney.com> <www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera mailing lists: <dragaera.info/> ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
