Re: [SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Brian Godette
On Monday 17 November 2003 01:29 pm, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Godette wrote: > > On Monday 17 November 2003 11:22 am, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > :0 c : $HOME/.sa$LOCKEXT > > > > > > * ^X-Spam-Checker-Version:.*-$SAVERSION > > > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*autolearn=ham > > > > >

Re: [SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Godette wrote: > On Monday 17 November 2003 11:22 am, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > :0 c : $HOME/.sa$LOCKEXT > > * ^X-Spam-Checker-Version:.*-$SAVERSION > > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*autolearn=ham > > | sa-learn --forget > > There's one problem with the above and that's spam t

Re: [SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael V. Sokolov writes: > >I've noticed message with such headers: > >X-Spam-Flag: YES >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on antispam >X-Spam-Level: ** >X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 aut

Re: [SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Brian Godette
On Monday 17 November 2003 11:22 am, Bart Schaefer wrote: > My solution is this little bit of procmail: > :0 c : $HOME/.sa$LOCKEXT > > * ^X-Spam-Checker-Version:.*-$SAVERSION > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*autolearn=ham > > | sa-learn --forget > > Replace $SAVERSION with whatever appears in your version_

Re: [SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Godette wrote: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=ham > > version=2.60 > > In my opinion this is an annoying flaw in 2.6 as any spam that doesn't > hit any of the standard rules is learned as ham, if the default > auto-learn t

Re: [SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Brian Godette
On Monday 17 November 2003 08:16 am, Michael V. Sokolov wrote: > I've noticed message with such headers: > > X-Spam-Flag: YES > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on > antispam X-Spam-Level: ** > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=ha

[SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Michael V. Sokolov
I've noticed message with such headers: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on antispam X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes

[SAtalk] autolearn ham ?!

2003-11-17 Thread Michael V. Sokolov
I've noticed message with such headers: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on antispam X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes

[SAtalk] autolearn=ham

2003-09-23 Thread Landy
i notied autolearn=ham does that mean if a spam passes as ham it will learn it has ham, how can i disable this autolearn feature and what does it really mean, i did not find anything in the doc --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGee