On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Godette wrote: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=ham > > version=2.60 > > In my opinion this is an annoying flaw in 2.6 as any spam that doesn't > hit any of the standard rules is learned as ham, if the default > auto-learn thresholds are used. This leads to a skewed bayes database > until you get around to doing an sa-learn --forget and sa-learn --spam > on the incorrectly learned messages
You don't need to do both. Using --spam (or --ham) implies a --forget if the message had already been learned as the other. > My "solution" to this issue, which isn't ideal but "it works for me"(tm), is > to set bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam to a small negative number in > local.cf. My solution is this little bit of procmail: :0 c : $HOME/.sa$LOCKEXT * ^X-Spam-Checker-Version:.*-$SAVERSION * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*autolearn=ham | sa-learn --forget Replace $SAVERSION with whatever appears in your version_tag directive in local.cf (you do have one, right?) I used --forget rather than --spam just in case it really was a false positive. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
