Steve Thomas wrote on Tue, 7 Jan 2003 15:35:53 -0800:
> all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Ah, yes, that's better than using the Sender header, my sendmail
milter will just use that as well and don't even bother SA with the
message. Thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:03:23PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Check this message (scroll down until you see tag!)
The copy of this spam that I got scored 7.7 against my filters.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0
tests=CTYPE_JUST_HTML,HTML_PRE,MAILTO_LINK,ONE_PIXEL_IMG,
Title: RE: [SPAM] [SAtalk] a very smart spammer. (score only 1.6)
I don't know much about the open source coding, but the commercial version had an option to "allow-recipient" ... maybe (following the example of your text below) something like whitelist_to ??? because lots o
ECTED]
| Subject: Re: [SPAM] [SAtalk] a very smart spammer. (score only 1.6)
|
|
| But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly
| because I adjusted WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only
| two false positives since I started trying out SA a week ago.
| Both with mails from
At Tue Jan 7 22:38:13 2003, Bolero (Kai Maillists) wrote:
> But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly
> because I adjusted WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two
> false positives since I started trying out SA a week ago. Both with
> mails from this list containin
But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly because I adjusted
WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two false positives since I started trying
out SA a week ago. Both with mails from this list containing spam. What's the easiest
way to whitelist this mailing list? wh
But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly because I adjusted
WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two false positives since I started trying
out SA a week ago. Both with mails from this list containing spam. What's the easiest
way to whitelist this mailing list? wh
ECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:03 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [SAtalk] a very smart spammer. (score only 1.6)
|
|
| Check this message (scroll down until you see tag!)
|
| Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Rec
Check this message (scroll down until you see tag!)
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mh1nj.bloomberg.com (mh1nj [160.43.164.207])
by bloomberg.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h06Neu520184
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:40:57 -0500 (EST)
Received:
