> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential
>
>
> Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This
&g
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:14:40AM -0600, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> > Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for
> > SQL-stored Bayes databases.
> >
> > I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main
> > tree since then,
> > but it's possible I've missed i
> Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for
> SQL-stored Bayes databases.
>
> I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main
> tree since then,
> but it's possible I've missed it.
Hmm... I don't recall seeing this at all; does anyone have any info on t
Thus spake Dan Kohn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20/11/03 14:35]:
> Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This
> Nigerian spam was almost certainly continually resent against
> SpamAssassin 2.60. Each time, the words were altered slightly until
> none of the rules fired. However,
Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This
Nigerian spam was almost certainly continually resent against
SpamAssassin 2.60. Each time, the words were altered slightly until
none of the rules fired. However, SpamAssassin with untrained Bayes
turned on can still catch the sp
