RE: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-24 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential > > > Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This &g

Re: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Parker
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:14:40AM -0600, Stewart, John wrote: > > > Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for > > SQL-stored Bayes databases. > > > > I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main > > tree since then, > > but it's possible I've missed i

RE: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-24 Thread Stewart, John
> Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for > SQL-stored Bayes databases. > > I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main > tree since then, > but it's possible I've missed it. Hmm... I don't recall seeing this at all; does anyone have any info on t

Re: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-23 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Dan Kohn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20/11/03 14:35]: > Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This > Nigerian spam was almost certainly continually resent against > SpamAssassin 2.60. Each time, the words were altered slightly until > none of the rules fired. However,

[SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-20 Thread Dan Kohn
Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This Nigerian spam was almost certainly continually resent against SpamAssassin 2.60. Each time, the words were altered slightly until none of the rules fired. However, SpamAssassin with untrained Bayes turned on can still catch the sp