Re: [SAtalk] V2.60 bayes error

2003-08-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:47:19PM -0700, Matt Thoene wrote: > Hmm...so I use spamc/spamd and the bayes_toks files are all in the > individual users .spamassassin directories. What permissions should they > have? Up until 2.60-cvs, they've all been 600. 600 is fine for the files, assuming spamc is

Re: [SAtalk] V2.60 bayes error

2003-08-16 Thread Matt Thoene
On Saturday, August 16, 2003 @ 5:34:59 PM [-0700], Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 05:17:57PM -0700, Matt Thoene wrote: >> Aug 16 16:00:32 ns1 spamd[14875]: Failed to run BAYES_50 >> SpamAssassin test, skipping: ^I(No write permission >> to sdbm file at lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes

[SAtalk] V2.60 bayes error

2003-08-16 Thread Matt Thoene
Hi, I apologize in advance if this should be posted to an alternate list... I'm getting the below errors with v 2.60-cvs... Aug 16 16:00:32 ns1 spamd[14875]: Failed to run BAYES_80 SpamAssassin test, skipping: ^I(No write permission to sdbm file at lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line 933,

Re: [SAtalk] V2.60 bayes error

2003-08-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 05:17:57PM -0700, Matt Thoene wrote: > Aug 16 16:00:32 ns1 spamd[14875]: Failed to run BAYES_50 SpamAssassin test, > skipping: ^I(No write permission > to sdbm file at lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line 933, line 42. ) > > What sdbm file does this error refer too?