Re: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs and user setups of whitelists

2002-10-23 Thread Justin Mason
Al Sparks said: > I'll ask a broader question. If we want users to be able to add their > own whitelist entries only, what's the best mechanism to do that? whitelist_from etc. all work in the user_prefs file. It's just new rules that cannot be defined. --j. -

Re: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs and user setups of whitelists

2002-10-23 Thread Justin Mason
"McClung, Darren W." said: > Spamd most certainly does use individual user_prefs files, and will create > them if they do not already exist. The wording of the readme would indicate > to me that you cannot define custom rules inside a user_prefs file. > > I'm curious to know what the "security

RE: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs and user setups of whitelists

2002-10-23 Thread McClung, Darren W.
though. Darren -Original Message- From: Al Sparks [mailto:data345@;yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 15:08 To: SpamAssassin List Subject: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs and user setups of whitelists The following is from the README file at http://www.spamassassin.

[SAtalk] Using user_prefs and user setups of whitelists

2002-10-23 Thread Al Sparks
The following is from the README file at http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/README. - $USER_HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs: User preferences file. If it does not exist, one of the default prefs file from above will be copied here for the user to edit later, if they wish. U

Re: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs

2002-07-17 Thread Robert Fleming
--On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:22 PM +0200 Carlo Borelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written: > I'm using spamd in daemon mode with vpopmail: daemon spamd -d -v -u > vpopmail -F 0 > What's the exact sintax forcing to read one configuration and not in the > vpopmail users own maildir

RE: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs

2002-07-17 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > I'm using spamd in daemon mode with vpopmail: daemon spamd -d -v -u > vpopmail -F 0 > What's the exact sintax forcing to read one configuration and not in the > vpopmail users own maildir ? > I must rise score from 5 to 7 and I don't know how. > > TYA. > Stop using the per user vpopmail conf

RE: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs

2002-07-17 Thread Carlo Borelli
Ok, how can I understand if spamassassin is reading the home configuration (in this case /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin) or from /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ? TYA. > You can make site_wide changes in > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. I think > this is probably what you really want, instead

Re: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs

2002-07-17 Thread Matt Kettler
You can make site_wide changes in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. I think this is probably what you really want, instead of trying to force the per-user files to all be the same. At 03:22 PM 7/17/2002 +0200, Carlo Borelli wrote: >I'm using spamd in daemon mode with vpopmail: daemon spamd -d -

RE: [SAtalk] Using user_prefs

2002-07-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
> I'm using spamd in daemon mode with vpopmail: daemon spamd -d -v -u > vpopmail -F 0 > What's the exact sintax forcing to read one configuration and > not in the > vpopmail users own maildir ? > I must rise score from 5 to 7 and I don't know how. > -x flag will disable per-user configs. ---

[SAtalk] Using user_prefs

2002-07-17 Thread Carlo Borelli
I'm using spamd in daemon mode with vpopmail: daemon spamd -d -v -u vpopmail -F 0 What's the exact sintax forcing to read one configuration and not in the vpopmail users own maildir ? I must rise score from 5 to 7 and I don't know how. TYA. -